Immigration has long been at the forefront of American politics but it wasn’t until the last couple years that I understood just how severe its consequences are. With migration comes people, with people comes baggage, not just literal baggage but economic, cultural and racial baggage.
When Rome was invaded by the Germanic tribes it started off as a trickle of migrants who wanted to experience the splendor of the Roman Empire. Rome was strong and citizenship was highly valuable. Many foreigners were willing to serve in the army in order to gain it. During this time, Rome was fat, happy and tolerant after years of prosperity and unquestioned regional dominance. Rome had begun to make the mistakes all decadent civilizations make, they spent more than they could afford and had to devalue their currency by reducing the amount of gold used in each coin. They also expanded far beyond their limits and were forced to rely heavily upon Auxiliary and Foederati forces that were not necessarily loyal to the Empire. The government became bloated, ineffective and corrupt. Before too long this trickle of hard working migrants became a tsunami of hostile invaders.
Does any of this sound familiar?
It should, because it is exactly what the West is experiencing today.
America was the shining light of civilization, we used to be what the rest of the world aspired to be. Migrants would come to Ellis Island in tears over the magnificence of New York City. These migrants would then dedicate themselves to earning the privilege of citizenship and contributing to America through a lifetime of hard work. They were grateful, hardworking and compatible people.
They were also, almost exclusively, European people.
As such, they shared at least some semblance of racial and cultural bond with the Americans who were also, almost exclusively of European ancestry.
This period was one of invention, industry, progress and opportunity. America was strong, unified and proud.
Much like Rome, we too became spoiled, apathetic and decadent. We gave away control of our currency to a quasi-private Federal Reserve who loaned us money at an unpayable interest, forever enslaving our nation to the will of the bankers. Our economy started to tank in the 1970s and never fully recovered. Our culture went from one of excellence, innovation and pride to a synthetic Pop-Culture manufactured by the media. Academia began to poison the minds of our children, making them hate themselves, their race and their nation. Our military lowered its standards and began to accept gang members, Communists, Muslims and the mentally ill. Our government has become completely incompetent, corrupt and even deliberately treasonous. Our borders are left unsecured and illegal intruders are viewed as victims rather than criminals, further devaluing the privilege of citizenship that so many worked so hard to attain.
So what is causing our immigration crisis?
Usually what spurs emigration is a conflict, economic collapse, famine or disaster. Chances are you aren’t going to leave your country if everything is just fine and dandy. There is always a catalyst that makes people want to escape their troubled situation. When this happens, the smartest and most well-to-do people are always the first to notice, as they have the foresight to see it coming before everyone else. These people will be the first to emigrate as they are also usually the ones with the wealth to afford the luxury of leaving before the situation gets too out of hand. Because of this, the first waves of migrants a country gets from a conflict zone are usually the best and brightest. This creates a false perception within the host nations that all subsequent waves will be just as intelligent and culturally compatible as the first. This is rarely the case. As the conflict in the migrant’s homeland intensifies more and more people leave and as the quantity of migrants increases, their quality decreases.
This creates what is known as a “brain drain”. In a brain drain, the best, wealthiest, most capable and most intelligent flee their homelands for safety and greener pastures. Unfortunately for their homeland, this increases the likelihood of total economic and societal collapse. With fewer and fewer of the best and brightest there to fix the mess, someone has to fill the gap, and the people who attempt to fill the gap are rarely successful, thus accelerating the collapse. It is because of this that we must be wary of accepting migrants, even if they truly are the best and brightest, not just for our sake, but for their own. Brain drains are very dangerous because they ensure that these nations remain in a primitive and underdeveloped state.
These migrants come here in need of work and are willing to work for less than citizens are. This drives down the average wage which, coupled with automation largely accounts for why, despite productivity increasing over the past few years, wages have remained stagnant.
As subsequent brain-drained waves of migrants come to Western nations, crime and social conflict increases which has its own cultural, economic and political impacts. Many others have covered this in depth, so I won’t beat the topic to death. Just check the news for proof of this, crimes are committed by immigrants and a massively disproportionate rate and prisons are filled with illegal and legal immigrants.
Migration is also being used to shift voting trends in favor of the Democrats who claim to be the advocates of immigrants and the oppressed. They have promised their voters lots of welfare, health care, food stamps, equality, social programs, amnesty and other goodies to ensure their party remains relevant in spite of a historic defeat in 2016. Their ideology is bankrupt and becoming increasingly irrelevant so their only chance at survival is opening the borders, granting amnesty and making utopian promises to their base in hopes that the demographic shift is enough to make up for their loss of White votes.
This demographic shift is going to have disastrous consequences on the West as we know it. The people coming here didn’t create the West and have no cultural investment in it. The majority aren’t the humble and grateful immigrants of the early 20th century. They hate White people and have been taught for decades that the White man is the reason for all of the problems in the world. They are coming here to loot us and send the money back home. But what happens when the money runs out?
Our ancestors came to America with nothing, pioneered the terrain, survived harsh weather in a completely foreign land and created a civilization that became the greatest on Earth. If they did it, these people should be able to fix their own homelands. If they can’t, then why are we giving away billions of dollars every year to people who have proven themselves to be incapable of surviving in the modern world.
I would argue one of our greatest follies was accepting immigration from non-White countries. These migrants carry with them the baggage of their homelands and their race. If a migrant is from a country and a race that is at a lower stage of civilizational development, the host nation will have to absorb the impact of the baggage that those people bring. For instance; the average IQ in Somalia is 68, if Somalian migrants come to America, a nation with an average IQ of 98 do you think that migrant is going to be compatible with our culture, laws and way of life? Of course not, and we shouldn’t set these migrants up for failure by allowing them in. More importantly, the host nation shouldn’t have to bear the burden of accepting incompatible peoples who are extraordinarily unlikely to succeed.
It’s not our problem.
Different cultures and different races progress at different rates. For instance, Western Europe was much quicker to modernize than Eastern Europe. Electricity, automobiles, airplanes and railroads were prevalent in Western Europe for at least 20–30 years before they could be commonly found in Eastern Europe. 30 years is a blink of an eye in racial terms and because of this, Western and Eastern Europeans are relatively compatible peoples. Juxtaposed to this is a comparison of Western Europeans to Africans. Western Europeans had already circumnavigated and mapped out the entire globe before Africans did…much of anything.
Africans are an extremely primitive race. They are, at bare minimum, a thousand years behind the Western World in terms of civilizational advancement. What little semblance of civilization they do have was all provided to them by Whites. That having been said, we need to stop giving them aide because they are becoming dependent on our help. The US government alone spends over $49 billion in foreign aide every year. And that is just the American government, not including other governments and all the hundreds of NGOs and churches who provide humanitarian aide to third world nations.
The saying “you feed, they breed” comes to mind. Impoverished people in general tend to adopt “r Selected” breeding habits in which they try to have as many children as possible as quickly as possible and hope that at least a few survive. It is a natural survival instinct that is common among low IQ or desperate people. High IQ people tend to be more successful and thus focus more of their time, effort and resources into fewer children. This ensures that those children receive the most love, attention, instruction and resources needed to give them the highest probability of success. This is known a “K Selection”. The concept of r/K Selection shows us that if we continue to give aide to an impoverished, low IQ nation, not only are we burdening ourselves, we are inadvertently accelerating their collapse which inadvertently accelerates our collapse. As these nations overpopulate, there are now even more mouths to feed and an even lower probability of success.
Furthermore, in giving these nations aide we are actually destroying their nation’s farming community. If someone is going to give you food for free, why would you pay someone else to grow it?
In trying to help them we are actually sabotaging them.
Life is funny like that sometimes. The old saying “the road to hell is paved with good intentions” is often true. As I pointed out in one of my previous articles most people don’t actually know enough about the way the world works to know how to most effectively help these people. They want to feel good about “doing the right thing”. I think this is borne out of virtue however, sometimes doing the right thing doesn’t always feel good.
So what do we do then? Spend even more money to keep even more people dependent on us?
Is it moral to contribute to the overpopulation of an unsustainable nation or race?
Is it moral to prolong their suffering at our expense?
Is it moral to flood our countries with incompatible migrants who hate us for our hospitality?
What would be best for them:
To cut all aide and let nature recorrect their overpopulation crisis?
Or feed them and let them overpopulate until the donor nations run out of money?
Then what happens?
Is the whole world to starve?
They say the best way to teach a child to swim is to throw them in the deep end. It seems cruel but this is what activates their natural instinct to swim. What we are doing is teaching them to swim with water wings and lifejackets, this might help them in the short term, but if they find themselves in a situation where they no longer have that support, how are they going to swim?
Same applies here, Europe didn’t have anyone to donate billions of dollars worth of aide to them during the Dark Ages. Europeans couldn’t emigrate anywhere to get welfare and health care. Europeans had to struggle for hundreds of years and from that struggle came progress and civilizational advancement into a new age, which had its own challenges which were also conquered...
Without anyone else’s help.
I want to see the third world succeed but that isn’t going to happen if they are dependent on our handouts, be they via aide from governments and NGOs in their homeland, or by collecting welfare in our homeland. And we aren’t going to succeed by opening our borders to incompatible people who hate us and by giving aide to faraway lands that are just going to squander it. They need to figure it out on their own, at their own pace, in their own homeland.
It’s not our problem.
We have our own problems. Like a Romanesque collapse of our own civilization. Or like a rapidly shifting demographic crisis that threatens to make Whites a minority in our own homelands. We need to focus all of our effort into saving the civilizations with the highest probability of success.
If the best civilizations collapse, all civilizations collapse. Which is exactly what happened when Rome fell, a time known as the Dark Ages and for good reason. We would be foolish to think that something similar couldn’t happen again. With as interconnected as our global economy is today, if any of the major superpower nations go under, all nations feel the repercussions of it.
Trump was right when he called these places “shithole countries” (assuming he actually did say that), they are! Despite all of our immoral wars for resources and world domination, we aren’t the reason why these countries are shitholes. They were shitholes long before we ever got there, and will be shitholes long after we leave. We tried helping them and all they’ve done is prove that they will never be self-sustaining and organically progress into the modern era if they are dependent on our help. We have to think of what is best for us, because what is best for us is what is best for Humanity.
Counter Currents Library
Savitri Devi's Books
William L Pierce's Works
A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History
The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life